Why You Shouldn’t Trust Anthony Scaramucci’s Criticism Of Donald Trump | The Last Word | MSNBC


for HR+/HER2- MBC. for HR+/HER2- MBC.>>>ONE OF THE MOST INCOMPETENT>>>ONE OF THE MOST INCOMPETENT PEOPLE WHO WAS HIRED TO WORK IN PEOPLE WHO WAS HIRED TO WORK IN THE TRUMP WHITE HOUSE HAS AT THE TRUMP WHITE HOUSE HAS AT LEAST FOR NOW PUBLICLY TURNED LEAST FOR NOW PUBLICLY TURNED AGAINST DONALD TRUMP AS HIS AGAINST DONALD TRUMP AS HIS LATEST PLOY FOR TRICKING LATEST PLOY FOR TRICKING TELEVISION BOOKERS INTO PUTTING TELEVISION BOOKERS INTO PUTTING HIM ON TV. HIM ON TV. AND ON THIS ONE I’VE GOT TO AND ON THIS ONE I’VE GOT TO ADMIT DONALD TRUMP IS ABSOLUTELY ADMIT DONALD TRUMP IS ABSOLUTELY RIGHT WHEN HE TWEETED TODAY RIGHT WHEN HE TWEETED TODAY “SCARAMUCCI, WHO LIKE SO MANY “SCARAMUCCI, WHO LIKE SO MANY OTHERS HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH MY OTHERS HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH MY ELECTION VICTORY, IS ONLY UPSET ELECTION VICTORY, IS ONLY UPSET THAT I DIDN’T WANT HIM BACK IN THAT I DIDN’T WANT HIM BACK IN THE ADMINISTRATION WHERE HE THE ADMINISTRATION WHERE HE DESPERATELY WANTED TO BE. DESPERATELY WANTED TO BE. LIST SELDOM HAD TIME TO RETURN LIST SELDOM HAD TIME TO RETURN HIS MANY CALLS TO ME. HIS MANY CALLS TO ME. HE JUST WANTED TO BE ON TV,” HE JUST WANTED TO BE ON TV,” EXCLAMATION POINT. EXCLAMATION POINT. AND THEN CAME THIS IN A AND THEN CAME THIS IN A BLOOMBERG REPORT. BLOOMBERG REPORT. “HE WORKED AT THE WHITE HOUSE “HE WORKED AT THE WHITE HOUSE FOR LESS THAN TWO WEEKS AND IS FOR LESS THAN TWO WEEKS AND IS CERTAINLY NO EXPERT ON THIS CERTAINLY NO EXPERT ON THIS PRESIDENT. PRESIDENT. WHITE HOUSE SPOKESWOMAN WHITE HOUSE SPOKESWOMAN STEPHANIE GRISHAM SAID THIS IS STEPHANIE GRISHAM SAID THIS IS ALL SO SELF-SERVING ON HIS PART ALL SO SELF-SERVING ON HIS PART AND THE MEDIA PLAYS RIGHT INTO AND THE MEDIA PLAYS RIGHT INTO IT AND THIS WILL SURELY BE THE IT AND THIS WILL SURELY BE THE ONLY TIME THAT I AGREE WITH THE ONLY TIME THAT I AGREE WITH THE CURRENT WHITE HOUSE PRESS CURRENT WHITE HOUSE PRESS SECRETARY. SECRETARY. ANTHONY SCARAMUCCI IS A LYING ANTHONY SCARAMUCCI IS A LYING FRAUD WHO SUPPORTED A LYING FRAUD WHO SUPPORTED A LYING FRAUD FOR PRESIDENT. FRAUD FOR PRESIDENT. HE THEN WON A POWER STRUGGLE HE THEN WON A POWER STRUGGLE WITH THE OTHER LYING FRAUDS WITH THE OTHER LYING FRAUDS WORKING IN THE WHITE HOUSE AT WORKING IN THE WHITE HOUSE AT THE TIME AND GOT HIMSELF THE TIME AND GOT HIMSELF APPOINTED WHITE HOUSE APPOINTED WHITE HOUSE COMMUNICATIONS DIRECTOR, A JOB COMMUNICATIONS DIRECTOR, A JOB HE WAS FIRED FROM BEFORE HE HE WAS FIRED FROM BEFORE HE COULD ACTUALLY START THE JOB COULD ACTUALLY START THE JOB BECAUSE OF AN INTERVIEW THAT HE BECAUSE OF AN INTERVIEW THAT HE GAVE TO THE “NEW YORKER” IN GAVE TO THE “NEW YORKER” IN WHICH HE ANNOUNCED HIS PLANS FOR WHICH HE ANNOUNCED HIS PLANS FOR THE WHITE HOUSE STAFF. THE WHITE HOUSE STAFF. “I’M GOING TO FIRE EVERY ONE OF “I’M GOING TO FIRE EVERY ONE OF THEM. THEM. THE ENTIRE PLACE WILL BE FIRED THE ENTIRE PLACE WILL BE FIRED OVER THE NEXT TWO WEEKS.” OVER THE NEXT TWO WEEKS.” HE ALSO SAID TO THE “NEW YORKER” HE ALSO SAID TO THE “NEW YORKER” WHEN COMPARING HIMSELF VERY WHEN COMPARING HIMSELF VERY FAVORABLY TO STEVE BANNON, “I’M FAVORABLY TO STEVE BANNON, “I’M NOT TRYING TO BLANK MY OWN NOT TRYING TO BLANK MY OWN BLANK.” BLANK.” NOW, REMEMBER, ANTHONY NOW, REMEMBER, ANTHONY SCARAMUCCI LIES ABOUT SCARAMUCCI LIES ABOUT EVERYTHING. EVERYTHING. SO IT IS ENTIRELY POSSIBLE THAT SO IT IS ENTIRELY POSSIBLE THAT HE WAS AND CONTINUES TO TRY TO HE WAS AND CONTINUES TO TRY TO BLANK HIS OWN BLANK. BLANK HIS OWN BLANK. ANTHONY SCARAMUCCI HAS NEVER ANTHONY SCARAMUCCI HAS NEVER APPEARED ON THIS PROGRAM BECAUSE APPEARED ON THIS PROGRAM BECAUSE HE IS ONE OF THE MOST RIDICULOUS HE IS ONE OF THE MOST RIDICULOUS CHARACTERS IN THE TRUMP FREAK CHARACTERS IN THE TRUMP FREAK SHOW AND HE IS A PROVEN LIAR AND SHOW AND HE IS A PROVEN LIAR AND PROVEN LIARS AREN’T WELCOME PROVEN LIARS AREN’T WELCOME HERE, ESPECIALLY THE CLOWNIEST HERE, ESPECIALLY THE CLOWNIEST OF THE CLOWNS IN THE TRUMP OF THE CLOWNS IN THE TRUMP WORLD. WORLD. ANTHONY SCARAMUCCI’S BREAK WITH ANTHONY SCARAMUCCI’S BREAK WITH THE PRESIDENT, IF IT HOLDS, THE PRESIDENT, IF IT HOLDS, WHICH IS ACTUALLY UNLIKELY WHICH IS ACTUALLY UNLIKELY BECAUSE THIS IS SCARAMUCCI WE’RE BECAUSE THIS IS SCARAMUCCI WE’RE TALKING ABOUT, WILL MEAN THE TALKING ABOUT, WILL MEAN THE LOSS OF AT MOST ONE TRUMP VOTE LOSS OF AT MOST ONE TRUMP VOTE IN THE STATE OF NEW YORK, WHICH IN THE STATE OF NEW YORK, WHICH DONALD TRUMP IS GOING TO LOSE DONALD TRUMP IS GOING TO LOSE ANYWAY. ANYWAY. THE WORDS “ANTHONY SCARAMUCCI” THE WORDS “ANTHONY SCARAMUCCI” HAVE ALWAYS MEANT ABSOLUTELY HAVE ALWAYS MEANT ABSOLUTELY NOTHING IN AMERICAN POLITICS AND NOTHING IN AMERICAN POLITICS AND THEY ALWAYS WILL. THEY ALWAYS WILL. HIS NEW CLAIM THAT HE IS LOOKING HIS NEW CLAIM THAT HE IS LOOKING FOR A REPUBLICAN TO CHALLENGE FOR A REPUBLICAN TO CHALLENGE DONALD TRUMP FOR THE REPUBLICAN DONALD TRUMP FOR THE REPUBLICAN NOMINATION MEANS THAT HE REMAINS NOMINATION MEANS THAT HE REMAINS SO FLAWLESSLY IGNORANT ABOUT SO FLAWLESSLY IGNORANT ABOUT AMERICAN POLITICS THAT HE AMERICAN POLITICS THAT HE DOESN’T EVEN KNOW THAT DONALD DOESN’T EVEN KNOW THAT DONALD TRUMP ALREADY HAS A SERIOUS TRUMP ALREADY HAS A SERIOUS REPUBLICAN PRIMARY CHALLENGER, REPUBLICAN PRIMARY CHALLENGER, THE FORMER REPUBLICAN GOVERNOR THE FORMER REPUBLICAN GOVERNOR OF WILLIAM WELD,>>>HERE IS IOWA REPUBLICAN>>>HERE IS IOWA REPUBLICAN VOTER KATE MILLER WHO HAS HAD VOTER KATE MILLER WHO HAS HAD ENOUGH OF DONALD TRUMP. ENOUGH OF DONALD TRUMP.>>I’M A LIFELONG CONSERVATIVE.>>I’M A LIFELONG CONSERVATIVE. I ACTUALLY CAMPAIGNED DOOR TO I ACTUALLY CAMPAIGNED DOOR TO DOOR FOR CHUCK GRASSLEY HIS DOOR FOR CHUCK GRASSLEY HIS FIRST YEAR AS A SENATE FIRST YEAR AS A SENATE CANDIDATE, BUT I CANNOT VOTE FOR CANDIDATE, BUT I CANNOT VOTE FOR DONALD TRUMP. DONALD TRUMP. HE IS NOT A CONSERVATIVE AND I HE IS NOT A CONSERVATIVE AND I DON’T THINK HE’S A GOOD MAN, AND DON’T THINK HE’S A GOOD MAN, AND WHEN YOU WATCH CABINET MEMBER WHEN YOU WATCH CABINET MEMBER AFTER CABINET MEMBER FALL AWAY AFTER CABINET MEMBER FALL AWAY FROM HIM, I JUST CAN’T VOTE FOR FROM HIM, I JUST CAN’T VOTE FOR HIM. HIM.>>JOINING OUR DISCUSSION NOW,>>JOINING OUR DISCUSSION NOW, BILL WELD, FORMER REPUBLICAN BILL WELD, FORMER REPUBLICAN GOVERNOR OF MASSACHUSETTS, HE IS GOVERNOR OF MASSACHUSETTS, HE IS RUNNING FOR THE REPUBLICAN RUNNING FOR THE REPUBLICAN PRESIDENTIAL NOMINATION AGAINST PRESIDENTIAL NOMINATION AGAINST DONALD TRUMP. DONALD TRUMP. GOVERNOR WELD, THANK YOU VERY GOVERNOR WELD, THANK YOU VERY MUCH FOR JOINING US TONIGHT. MUCH FOR JOINING US TONIGHT. IT SOUNDS LIKE KATE MILLER IS IT SOUNDS LIKE KATE MILLER IS READY TO HEAR FROM YOU WHEN YOU READY TO HEAR FROM YOU WHEN YOU GET TO IOWA. GET TO IOWA.>>WELL, I HOPE THAT’S SO,>>WELL, I HOPE THAT’S SO, LAWRENCE, AND I HOPE THAT MAYBE LAWRENCE, AND I HOPE THAT MAYBE NEXT TIME YOU’LL TELL US WHAT NEXT TIME YOU’LL TELL US WHAT YOU REALLY THINK ABOUT ANTHONY YOU REALLY THINK ABOUT ANTHONY SCARAMUCCI. SCARAMUCCI. BUT SERIOUSLY, I THINK THE MOOCH BUT SERIOUSLY, I THINK THE MOOCH MAY HAVE SETTLED ON A VALUABLE MAY HAVE SETTLED ON A VALUABLE METAPHOR, DURABLE METAPHOR IN METAPHOR, DURABLE METAPHOR IN CHERNOBYL, BECAUSE THAT SUGGESTS CHERNOBYL, BECAUSE THAT SUGGESTS THE IDEA OF A MELTDOWN, OR THE IDEA OF A MELTDOWN, OR WHATEVER YOU CALL IT, MELTDOWN WHATEVER YOU CALL IT, MELTDOWN OR UNHINGED OR UNTETHERED. OR UNHINGED OR UNTETHERED. I DO SENSE A RUMBLING THERE THAT I DO SENSE A RUMBLING THERE THAT THE PRESIDENT HAS BEEN OBLIGED THE PRESIDENT HAS BEEN OBLIGED TO SPEND SO MUCH TIME DEALING TO SPEND SO MUCH TIME DEALING WITH THINGS INSIDE HIS OWN HEAD, WITH THINGS INSIDE HIS OWN HEAD, NOTABLY THE EMOTIONS OF ANGER NOTABLY THE EMOTIONS OF ANGER AND FEAR THAT, YOU KNOW, IT MAY AND FEAR THAT, YOU KNOW, IT MAY BE AT SOME POINT IN THE BE AT SOME POINT IN THE NOT-TOO-DISTANT FUTURE, HE’S NOT-TOO-DISTANT FUTURE, HE’S GOING TO SEEMINGLY BE GOING TO SEEMINGLY BE OVERWHELMED BY THE DEMANDS OF OVERWHELMED BY THE DEMANDS OF HIS JOB. HIS JOB. AND AS YOU KNOW, I THINK HE’S AND AS YOU KNOW, I THINK HE’S GOING PHO LOSE BY A LOT NEXT GOING PHO LOSE BY A LOT NEXT YEAR, AND I THINK PARTLY IT’S YEAR, AND I THINK PARTLY IT’S BECAUSE THE U.S. HOUSE HAS TO BECAUSE THE U.S. HOUSE HAS TO RECOGNIZE THEY DON’T GIVE RECOGNIZE THEY DON’T GIVE ADVISORY OPINIONS. ADVISORY OPINIONS. THEY NEED REAL FACTS SO THEY THEY NEED REAL FACTS SO THEY NEED A REAL INVESTIGATION TO GET NEED A REAL INVESTIGATION TO GET REAL FACTS, AND THAT TAKES EIGHT REAL FACTS, AND THAT TAKES EIGHT OR TEN GOOD MONTHS, NOT GOOD OR TEN GOOD MONTHS, NOT GOOD MONTHS FOR MR. TRUMP. MONTHS FOR MR. TRUMP.>>GOVERNOR, WHEN YOU WERE>>GOVERNOR, WHEN YOU WERE GOVERNOR OF MASSACHUSETTS IN THE GOVERNOR OF MASSACHUSETTS IN THE EARLY 1990s, YOU SUPPORTED AN EARLY 1990s, YOU SUPPORTED AN ASSAULT WEAPONS BAN THERE. ASSAULT WEAPONS BAN THERE. IN THE AFTERMATH NOW LAST WEEK IN THE AFTERMATH NOW LAST WEEK OF DAYTON AND OF EL PASO, DO YOU OF DAYTON AND OF EL PASO, DO YOU THINK YOU CAN ARGUE AN ASSAULT THINK YOU CAN ARGUE AN ASSAULT WEAPONS BAN TO REPUBLICAN WEAPONS BAN TO REPUBLICAN PRIMARY VOTERS? PRIMARY VOTERS?>>I THINK WHEN PEOPLE SAY>>I THINK WHEN PEOPLE SAY ASSAULT WEAPONS, A LOT OF THEM ASSAULT WEAPONS, A LOT OF THEM EVEN AUTOMATIC WEAPONS, AND EVEN AUTOMATIC WEAPONS, AND THOSE ARE, AS YOU KNOW, ALREADY THOSE ARE, AS YOU KNOW, ALREADY ILLEGAL. ILLEGAL. YOU HAVE TO BE A FEDERALLY YOU HAVE TO BE A FEDERALLY LICENSED FIREARMS DEALER TO OWN LICENSED FIREARMS DEALER TO OWN A FULLY AUTOMATIC WEAPON. A FULLY AUTOMATIC WEAPON. I’M TIRED OF ALL THIS TALK ABOUT I’M TIRED OF ALL THIS TALK ABOUT UNIVERSAL BACKGROUND CHECKS ON UNIVERSAL BACKGROUND CHECKS ON STEROIDS. STEROIDS. PEOPLE ARE EVEN TALKING ABOUT PEOPLE ARE EVEN TALKING ABOUT LICENSING ALL WEAPONS OUT THERE. LICENSING ALL WEAPONS OUT THERE. THERE ARE 300 MILLION RIFLES OUT THERE ARE 300 MILLION RIFLES OUT THERE IN PRIVATE HANDS, AND YOU THERE IN PRIVATE HANDS, AND YOU KNOW ME, LAWRENCE, I KIND OF KNOW ME, LAWRENCE, I KIND OF TEND TOWARD THE LIBERTARIAN TEND TOWARD THE LIBERTARIAN SIDE. SIDE. I REGARD PRIVATE GUN OWNERSHIP I REGARD PRIVATE GUN OWNERSHIP AS KIND OF A BULWARK AGAINST AS KIND OF A BULWARK AGAINST POSSIBLE GOVERNMENT POSSIBLE GOVERNMENT OVERREACHING. OVERREACHING. IF YOU LOOK AT HISTORY, HITLER IF YOU LOOK AT HISTORY, HITLER MAKES IT IMPOSSIBLE FOR THE MAKES IT IMPOSSIBLE FOR THE JUICE TO OWN FIREARMS, AND WHEN JUICE TO OWN FIREARMS, AND WHEN THE KNOCK ON THE DOOR COMES, THE KNOCK ON THE DOOR COMES, THEY CAN’T RESIST. THEY CAN’T RESIST. THEY GO TO CONCENTRATION CAMPS. THEY GO TO CONCENTRATION CAMPS. HE KILLED EVERYONE WHO WASN’T HE KILLED EVERYONE WHO WASN’T PART OF HIS COALITION. PART OF HIS COALITION. I DO THINK RED FLAGS AND HOOKS I DO THINK RED FLAGS AND HOOKS TO SIGNS OF MENTAL ILLNESS OR TO SIGNS OF MENTAL ILLNESS OR REPORTS OF VIOLENCE BY A REPORTS OF VIOLENCE BY A COWORKER OR FAMILY MEMBER, COWORKER OR FAMILY MEMBER, THAT’S FINE. THAT’S FINE. IN THIS COUNTRY YOU CAN GET IN IN THIS COUNTRY YOU CAN GET IN FRONT OF A JUDGE IN SIX HOURS, FRONT OF A JUDGE IN SIX HOURS, AND A JUDGE CAN DECIDE WHETHER AND A JUDGE CAN DECIDE WHETHER THE PERSON IS A DANGER TO THE PERSON IS A DANGER TO THEMSELVES OR OTHERS, AND I THEMSELVES OR OTHERS, AND I THINK THAT WOULD BE A MUCH MORE THINK THAT WOULD BE A MUCH MORE DIRECT WAY TO GO AT THESE MASS DIRECT WAY TO GO AT THESE MASS SHOOTINGS THAN SAYING, WE WANT SHOOTINGS THAN SAYING, WE WANT TO LICENSE 300 MILLION RIFLES. TO LICENSE 300 MILLION RIFLES.>>WELL, THE LICENSING ARGUMENT>>WELL, THE LICENSING ARGUMENT IS ABOUT SALES THAT GO ON NOW. IS ABOUT SALES THAT GO ON NOW. IN ORDER TO GO TO A WEAPONS IN ORDER TO GO TO A WEAPONS STORE AND PURCHASE SOMETHING STORE AND PURCHASE SOMETHING NOW, YOU WOULD HAVE TO BE NOW, YOU WOULD HAVE TO BE LICENSED TO DO THAT. LICENSED TO DO THAT. IN SOME OF THE PROPOSALS YOU IN SOME OF THE PROPOSALS YOU WOULD HAVE TO BE INSURED. WOULD HAVE TO BE INSURED. JUST LIKE AN AUTOMOBILE. JUST LIKE AN AUTOMOBILE. JUST LIKE IF YOU GET A NEW CAR JUST LIKE IF YOU GET A NEW CAR TOMORROW, WHAT YOU HAVE TO DO TOMORROW, WHAT YOU HAVE TO DO WITH A NEW CAR. WITH A NEW CAR. THERE ARE PLENTY OF PEOPLE THAT THERE ARE PLENTY OF PEOPLE THAT HAVE OLD CARS IN THE BACKYARD HAVE OLD CARS IN THE BACKYARD THAT AREN’T REGISTERED. THAT AREN’T REGISTERED. NOBODY IS SAYING THEY HAVE TO NOBODY IS SAYING THEY HAVE TO REGISTER THOSE. REGISTER THOSE.>>YEAH, THAT’S RIGHT.>>YEAH, THAT’S RIGHT. WHEN I GOT MY FIRST SHOTGUN, I WHEN I GOT MY FIRST SHOTGUN, I SURE AS HELL HAD TO TAKE A SURE AS HELL HAD TO TAKE A HUNTER SAFETY COURSE, SO I’M NOT HUNTER SAFETY COURSE, SO I’M NOT SAYING YOU CAN’T PUT ANY SAYING YOU CAN’T PUT ANY CONDITIONS ON THE ACQUISITION OF CONDITIONS ON THE ACQUISITION OF FIREARMS. FIREARMS. BUT I DO WANT TO POINT OUT THAT BUT I DO WANT TO POINT OUT THAT THROUGHOUT HISTORY, WHEN THE THROUGHOUT HISTORY, WHEN THE GOVERNMENT HAS IMPOSED STRINGENT GOVERNMENT HAS IMPOSED STRINGENT CONDITIONS UPON THE MERE CONDITIONS UPON THE MERE OWNERSHIP OF FIREARMS, HAVING OWNERSHIP OF FIREARMS, HAVING NOTHING TO DO WITH SAFETY OR NOTHING TO DO WITH SAFETY OR VIOLENCE OR THREATS. VIOLENCE OR THREATS. THAT HAS OFTEN ENDED IN THAT HAS OFTEN ENDED IN DISASTER. DISASTER. SO GUN OWNERSHIP BY ITSELF SO GUN OWNERSHIP BY ITSELF SHOULD NOT BE THE FOCUS HERE. SHOULD NOT BE THE FOCUS HERE.>>BUT NO ONE IS TALKING ABOUT>>BUT NO ONE IS TALKING ABOUT GUNS IN GENERAL, THEY’RE TALKING GUNS IN GENERAL, THEY’RE TALKING ABOUT THESE PARTICULAR KINDS OF ABOUT THESE PARTICULAR KINDS OF WEAPONS, THESE HIGH-POWERED WEAPONS, THESE HIGH-POWERED WEAPONS THAT CAN FIRE SO MANY WEAPONS THAT CAN FIRE SO MANY BULLETS WITH THOSE MAGAZINES. BULLETS WITH THOSE MAGAZINES. THEY’RE NOT TALKING ABOUT THEY’RE NOT TALKING ABOUT REVOLVERS, THEY’RE NOT TALKING REVOLVERS, THEY’RE NOT TALKING ABOUT HANDGUNS — ABOUT HANDGUNS –>>YOU SAID ANOTHER MAGIC WORD,>>YOU SAID ANOTHER MAGIC WORD, WHICH IS MAGAZINE. WHICH IS MAGAZINE. ONE OF THESE TWO FELLOWS WHO DID ONE OF THESE TWO FELLOWS WHO DID THE SHOOTING OVER THE WEEKEND THE SHOOTING OVER THE WEEKEND WAS WALKING AROUND DOWNTOWN WITH WAS WALKING AROUND DOWNTOWN WITH A MAGAZINE HOLDING 100 ROUNDS. A MAGAZINE HOLDING 100 ROUNDS. NO, THAT’S NOT A GOD-GIVEN NO, THAT’S NOT A GOD-GIVEN RIGHT. RIGHT. BUT GOING AFTER JUST PURE RIFLE BUT GOING AFTER JUST PURE RIFLE OR SHOTGUN BY IFT,TSELF, EVEN IF OR SHOTGUN BY IFT,TSELF, EVEN IF IT’S A FIVE-SHOT SEMIAUTOMATIC, IT’S A FIVE-SHOT SEMIAUTOMATIC, THE AR-15 IS A STANDARD U.S. THE AR-15 IS A STANDARD U.S. MILITARY RIFLE. MILITARY RIFLE. PEOPLE DO USE FIVE-SHOT RIFLES PEOPLE DO USE FIVE-SHOT RIFLES IN HUNTING. IN HUNTING. THAT DOES NOT SHOCK MY THAT DOES NOT SHOCK MY CONSCIENCE AS A WEAPON. CONSCIENCE AS A WEAPON. IF YOU MAKE IT FULLY AUTOMATIC IF YOU MAKE IT FULLY AUTOMATIC BY REMOVING A PIN, I USED TO BY REMOVING A PIN, I USED TO PROSECUTE PEOPLE FOR THAT. PROSECUTE PEOPLE FOR THAT. THAT’S A CRIME, BECAUSE THAT THAT’S A CRIME, BECAUSE THAT TRANSFORMS IT INTO AN AUTOMATIC TRANSFORMS IT INTO AN AUTOMATIC WEAPON. WEAPON. BUT I DON’T THINK THAT’S ALL BUT I DON’T THINK THAT’S ALL WELL UNDERSTOOD, BUT I DO THINK WELL UNDERSTOOD, BUT I DO THINK THAT THE CONVERSATION IS HEALTHY THAT THE CONVERSATION IS HEALTHY BECAUSE I THINK THE RED FLAG BECAUSE I THINK THE RED FLAG LAWS WHERE PEOPLE CAN GET AN LAWS WHERE PEOPLE CAN GET AN INJUNCTION FROM A JUDGE OR AN INJUNCTION FROM A JUDGE OR AN ORDER THAT SOMEONE SURRENDER ORDER THAT SOMEONE SURRENDER THEIR WEAPON IF THEY HAVE A THEIR WEAPON IF THEY HAVE A SUFFICIENT HISTORY OF VIOLENCE SUFFICIENT HISTORY OF VIOLENCE OR VIOLENT TENDENCIES. OR VIOLENT TENDENCIES. LIKE ONE OF THESE GUYS CARRIED LIKE ONE OF THESE GUYS CARRIED AROUND A LIST IN HIGH SCHOOL OF AROUND A LIST IN HIGH SCHOOL OF PEOPLE HE WANTED TO KILL. PEOPLE HE WANTED TO KILL. THERE WAS ONE OF THE TERRIBLE THERE WAS ONE OF THE TERRIBLE CASES TWO YEARS AGO WHERE THE CASES TWO YEARS AGO WHERE THE FBI HAD OPEN INVESTIGATIONS ON FBI HAD OPEN INVESTIGATIONS ON THE FELLOW WHO COMMITTED THE THE FELLOW WHO COMMITTED THE CRIMES TWICE AND HAD TO CLOSE CRIMES TWICE AND HAD TO CLOSE THEM BECAUSE THERE WAS A RULE THEM BECAUSE THERE WAS A RULE THEN THAT YOU HAD TO CLOSE A THEN THAT YOU HAD TO CLOSE A CASE IN SIX MONTHS. CASE IN SIX MONTHS. THAT’S NOT HOW THE CRIMINAL THAT’S NOT HOW THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM WORKS. JUSTICE SYSTEM WORKS. IT TAKES LONGER THAN THAT OFTEN IT TAKES LONGER THAN THAT OFTEN TO BUILD THESE CASES. TO BUILD THESE CASES. BUT FOCUSING ON PEOPLE, YOU BUT FOCUSING ON PEOPLE, YOU KNOW, THE POTENTIAL PEOPLE KNOW, THE POTENTIAL PEOPLE INVOLVED, I THINK, IS THE INVOLVED, I THINK, IS THE SHORTEST WAY TO GET THERE. SHORTEST WAY TO GET THERE.>>GOVERNOR WELD, WE HAVEN’T>>GOVERNOR WELD, WE HAVEN’T JUST RUN OUT OF TIME, WE’VE GONE JUST RUN OUT OF TIME, WE’VE GONE INTO OVERTIME. INTO OVERTIME. WE HAVE TO GET OUT OF HERE. WE HAVE TO GET OUT OF HERE. THANK YOU VERY MUCH FOR JOINING THANK YOU VERY MUCH FOR JOINING US AND PLEASE LET ANTHONY

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *