Trump calls out media coverage of ex-DNI nominee Ratcliffe

Trump calls out media coverage of ex-DNI nominee Ratcliffe


>>[QUESTION INAUDIBLE]>>WHICH PROCESS ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT?>>THE CONFIRMATION PROCESS.>>BECAUSE I FELT THAT CONGRESSMAN RATCLIFFE WAS BEING TREATED VERY UNFAIRLY. I READ THE PRESS. I THINK I AM A STUDENT OF THE PRESS. I COULD SEE THAT THE PRESS WAS TREATING HIM VERY UNFAIRLY. HE’S AN OUTSTANDING MAN. I ASKED HIM, I SAID, DO YOU WANT TO GO THROUGH THIS FOR TWO OR THREE MONTHS OR WANT ME TO MAYBE DO SOMETHING ELSE? HE THOUGHT ABOUT IT. I SAID IT’S GOING TO BE ROUGH. I CAN SEE EXACTLY WHERE THE PRESS IS GOING. FAKE NEWS. HE’S A FINE MAN. SO WE HADN’T STARTED THE PROCESS. I THOUGHT IT’S EASIER BEFORE WE START. I READ THINGS THAT WERE JUST UNFAIR. HE’S JUST TOO GOOD. HE DOESN’T DESERVE IT.>>[QUESTION INAUDIBLE]>>WHAT?>>[QUESTION INAUDIBLE]>>THAT MIGHT BE. I LIKE SUE GORDON. SUE GORDON IS THERE NOW. I LIKE HER VERY MUCH. I’VE ALWAYS LIKED SUE GORDON.>>[QUESTION INAUDIBLE]>>COULD BE. WE’LL MAKE ANOTHER CHOICE. SUE WILL BE — SHE’S THERE NOW AND CERTAINLY SHE WILL BE CONSIDERED FOR THE ACTING. THAT COULD HAPPEN. WE’LL PROBABLY BE TALKING ABOUT IT EITHER LATER TODAY OR NEXT WEEK. YOU LIKE SUE GORDON?>>[QUESTION INAUDIBLE]>>NO, I THINK HE WAS JUST TREATED VERY BADLY, VERY HARSHLY BY THE PRESS. HE REALLY HAD A DECISION TO MAKE. YOU WANT TO GO THROUGH THIS FOR — IT COULD BE MONTHS. I SAID I THINK I SEE EXACTLY WHAT THEY’RE TRYING TO DO. NOBODY UNDERSTANDS THE PRESS. I THINK I UNDERSTAND THEM AS WELL AS ANYBODY. I DIDN’T THINK IT WAS FAIR.>>[QUESTION INAUDIBLE]>>NO, THEY DIDN’T. I THINK HE WOULD HAVE HAD SUPPORT, BUT AGAIN WE WERE VERY EARLY IN THE PROCESS. WE HADN’T EVEN STARTED. SO WE WERE VERY EARLY IN THE PROCESS. I THINK HE WOULD HAVE HAD GOOD SUPPORT CERTAINLY FROM THE REPUBLICANS.>>[QUESTION INAUDIBLE]>>I HAVEN’T SEEN THAT. THE DEMOCRATS WERE CHILLY. THAT’S FOR SURE. BUT THE REPUBLICANS I THINK WOULD HAVE BEEN VERY GOOD. A LOT OF THE REPUBLICANS DIDN’T EVEN KNOW JOHN. SO I THINK HE WOULD HAVE GOOD RECEPTIVITY. HE WAS GETTING THAT. I BELIEVE HE MADE THE RIGHT DECISION.>>[QUESTION INAUDIBLE]>>YOU UNDERSTAND? I –>>[QUESTION INAUDIBLE]>>NO, YOU VET FOR ME. I LIKE WHEN YOU VET. THE WHITE HOUSE HAS A GREAT VETTING PROCESS. WHEN YOU VET FOR ME, I GIVE A NAME, GIVE IT TO THE PRESS AND YOU VET FOR ME. A LOT OF TIMES YOU DO A VERY GOOD JOB. NOT ALWAYS. I THINK THE — IF YOU LOOKED AT IT, IF YOU TAKE A LOOK AT IT, THE VETTING PROCESS FOR THE WHITE HOUSE IS VERY GOOD. YOU’RE PART OF THE VETTING PROCESS, YOU KNOW? I GIVE OUT A NAME TO THE PRESS AND THEY VET FOR ME. WE SAVE A LOT OF MONEY THAT WAY. IN THE CASE OF JOHN, I BELIEVE THAT HE WAS BEING TREATED VERY HARSHLY AND VERY UNFAIRLY.>>[QUESTION INAUDIBLE]>>NO, I’LL TELL YOU WHAT, I THOUGHT HE WOULD HAVE HAD VERY GOOD SUPPORT. THE REPUBLICANS LOVE JOHN RATCLIFFE. HE WOULD HAVE HAD VERY GOOD SUPPORT. HE WASN’T IN THAT WORLD THAT MUCH. I THINK HE WOULD HAVE PICKED IT UP VERY QUICKLY. I THINK HE WOULD HAVE HAD GREAT REPUBLICAN SUPPORT. PROBABLY NO DEMOCRAT SUPPORT, WHICH WOULD HAVE BEEN NICE TO GET SOME. BUT I THINK HE WOULD HAVE DONE FINE. IT WOULD HAVE BEEN A LONG, HARD BATTLE.>>[QUESTION INAUDIBLE]>>THAT’S OKAY. I DON’T MIND THAT. THE TWEET ITSELF WAS JUST REALLY A REPEAT OF WHAT I HEARD OVER THE NEWS. I KNOW HIS HOUSE WAS ROBBED. I THOUGHT THAT WAS TOO BAD. THAT WAS REALLY JUST — THAT WAS NOT MEANT AS A WISE GUY TWEET. HIS HOUSE WAS ROBBED. IT CAME OVER THE NEWS AT A CERTAIN MOMENT LAST NIGHT. I HAD JUST MENTIONED IT.>>[QUESTION INAUDIBLE]>>WELL, I THINK JOHN, NUMBER 1 — YOU HAVE TO UNDERSTAND, WE’RE SO FAR BEHIND. WE HAVE BEEN TREATED SO BADLY. I DON’T BLAME CHINA. I BLAME OUR PAST LEADERS, OUR PAST PRESIDENT, OUR PAST TRADE REPRESENTATIVES. THEY’VE DONE A TERRIBLE JOB. CHINA — WE CAN’T JUST GO AND MAKE AN EVEN DEAL WITH CHINA. WE HAVE TO MAKE A BETTER DEAL WITH CHINA. RIGHT NOW THEY HAVE A VERY UNFAIR PLAYING FIELD. I’M TURNING IT AROUND. SO WE’RE GETTING 25% OF $250 BILLION AND NOW 10% OF PROBABLY CLOSE TO $350 BILLION. A LOT OF MONEY. CHINA HAS TO DO A LOT OF THINGS TO TURN IT AROUND. YOU’LL BE SEEING. THEY HAVE TO DO A LOT OF THINGS. IT GOES ON SEPTEMBER 1. FRANKLY, IF THEY DON’T DO THEM, I CAN ALWAYS INCREASE IT VERY SUBSTANTIALLY. IN OTHER WORDS, I CAN INCREASE IT IF I WANTED TO A VERY MUCH HIGHER NUMBER.>>[QUESTION INAUDIBLE]>>WELL, IT’S IN A PROCESS RIGHT NOW. I KNOW THE CASE VERY WELL. IT’S A VERY SAD SITUATION. IT IS HEARTBREAKING. THAT’S IN A PROCESS RIGHT NOW. I’M NOT GOING TO GET INVOLVED IN THE PROCESS. AS YOU KNOW, THEY’LL BE MAKING A FINAL DECISION OVER THE NEXT TEN DAYS. SO I WON’T INTERFERE WITH THE PROCESS.>>[QUESTION INAUDIBLE]>>WELL, WE’VE BEEN MOVING IT DOWN. WE’VE BEEN MOVING IT DOWN FROM SYRIA. WE DEFEATED THE ISIS CALIPHATE. WE HAVE NOW 100% OF THAT. WE HAVE 2,500 PRISONERS. EUROPE IS GOING TO HAVE TO TAKE THEM OR SOMEBODY WILL HAVE TO TAKE THEM. BUT WE HAVE 2,500 ISIS PRISONERS. WE’VE TOLD EUROPE, HEY, SOME COME FROM FRANCE, SOME COME FROM GERMANY. THEY’RE GOING TO HAVE TO TAKE THEM. WE’LL SEE WHAT HAPPENS. WE’VE PRETTY MUCH REDUCED — WE’VE TAKEN IT WAY DOWN IN SYRIA. ULTIMATELY IT’S DOWN TO A VERY FEW PEOPLE, IF ANY. WITH RESPECT TO AFGHANISTAN, WE MADE A LOT OF PROGRESS. WE’RE TALKING. BUT WE’VE ALSO MADE A LOT OF PROGRESS. WE’RE REDUCING IT. WE’VE BEEN THERE FOR 19 YEARS. WE’RE SERVING AS POLICEMEN. WE COULD WIN AFGHANISTAN IN TWO DAYS OR THREE DAYS OR FOUR DAYS IF WE WANTED. I’M NOT LOOKING TO KILL 10 MILLION PEOPLE.>>[QUESTION INAUDIBLE] WHAT ABOUT IT?>>[QUESTION INAUDIBLE] WE CAN WIN THAT WAR VERY EASILY. I COULD WIN THAT WAR IN A WEEK IF I WANTED TO. I’M NOT LOOKING TO KILL 10 MILLION PEOPLE. OKAY? MANY OF THEM WOULD BE INNOCENT PEOPLE. I’M NOT LOOKING TO DO THAT. I’M NOT TALKING NUCLEAR, BY THE WAY. I’M TALKING TOTALLY CONVENTIONAL. I’M NOT LOOKING TO KILL MILLIONS OF PEOPLE IN AFGHANISTAN.>>[QUESTION INAUDIBLE]>>THAT I CAN’T TELL YOU. WE’LL FIND OUT.>>[QUESTION INAUDIBLE]>>I HEAR HE’S DONE A GOOD JOB. I DON’T KNOW CONGRESSMAN HURD. WE DIFFER ON CERTAIN SUBJECTS. I HEARD HE’S DONE A GOOD JOB. IT’S TOO BAD HE’S LEAVING. REALLY DON’T KNOW HIM.>>[QUESTION INAUDIBLE]>>I DO HAVE A SHORT LIST. I HAVE A LIST OF A FEW PEOPLE. WE’RE LOOKING AT VERY WELL-KNOWN PEOPLE. PEOPLE WHERE THE VETTING WOULD GO EASILY BECAUSE THAT’S WHAT THEY’VE BEEN DOING. THEY’RE IN THE INTELLIGENCE WORLD. SO WE DO. I HAVE A LIST OF THREE PEOPLE THAT I’M GOING TO BE WORKING ON OVER THE WEEKEND. WE’RE GOING TO BEDMINSTER. I’LL BE WORKING ON THAT OVER THE WEEKEND AND MONDAY I’LL GIVE YOU AN ANSWER. I DO LIKE SUE GORDON VERY MUCH AS ACTING AS PER YOUR QUESTION.>>[QUESTION INAUDIBLE]>>SAY AGAIN.>>[QUESTION INAUDIBLE]>>I THINK WE REAL — WE HAVE A LOT OF GOOD PEOPLE. WE HAVE THREE PEOPLE SPECIFICALLY. I CAN TELL YOU. THEY’RE RIGHT HERE.>>WHO ARE THEY?>>IT’S TOO EARLY. YOU WANT A PIECE OF THE LIST?>>[QUESTION INAUDIBLE]>>I DON’T WANT TO SAY IF THEY CAN BE TRUSTED OR NOT. HISTORY I’D SAY IS NOT SO GOOD. THEY DON’T LIKE US MUCH EITHER. WE’VE BROUGHT THEM DOWN. WE BROUGHT THE NUMBERS OF SOLDIERS DOWN SUBSTANTIALLY. THEY’RE COMING DOWN. WE’RE TALKING TO THEM. WE HAVE A LOT OF ADVANTAGES MAKING A DEAL WITH US. WE’RE DOING VERY WELL WITH PAKISTAN. I MET A GENTLEMAN THAT I LIKED A LOT AS YOU KNOW LAST WEEK FROM PAKISTAN. I HAVE A LOT OF RESPECT FOR. A GOOD FRIENDSHIP, A GOOD FEELING, A GOOD CHEMISTRY. I THINK PAKISTAN WILL HELP US AND I THINK OTHERS WILL GET INVOLVED. BUT WE’VE BEEN THERE 19 YEARS. WE’RE NOT REALLY — LET’S PUT IT THIS WAY. WE’RE MORE POLICEMEN THAN ANYTHING ELSE. THAT’S NOT FOR OUR SOLDIERS. I SAID IT A LOT. WE CAN WIN THE WAR, IF YOU LOOK AT IT AND LOOK AT IT ANYWAY YOU WANT, WE COULD WIN THE WAR IN AFGHANISTAN IN LESS THAN A WEEK. I’M NOT LOOKING TO KILL 10 MILLION PEOPLE. I’M NOT TALKING NUCLEAR. WE WOULD WIN THAT WAR IN LESS THAN A WEEK. I HAVE THAT AS AN OPTION ALWAYS. THAT’S WHAT WE’RE NOT LOOKING TO DO.>>[QUESTION INAUDIBLE]>>WITH RUSSIA, WE HAVE BEEN SPEAKING TO RUSSIA ABOUT THAT, ABOUT A PACT FOR NUCLEAR. SO THAT THEY GET RID OF SOME, WE GET RID OF SOME. PROBABLY HAVE TO PUT CHINA IN THERE. RIGHT NOW WE’RE NUMBER 1, RUSSIA IS NUMBER 2 AND CHINA IS NUMBER 3. CHINA IS QUITE A BIT DOWN IN TERMS OF NUCLEAR. THEY’RE MUCH LOWER. WE WOULD CERTAINLY WANT TO INCLUDE CHINA AT SOME POINT. I WOULD THINK THAT THE RELATIONSHIP IS GOOD. WE’RE TRYING TO HAVE A GOOD RELATIONSHIP. IT’S VERY HARD IN LIGHT OF THE PHONY WITCH HUNT, WHICH IS NOW DEAD. I’LL SAY THIS WITH RUSSIA. IF WE COULD GET A PACT WHERE THEY REDUCE AND WE REDUCE NUCLEAR, THAT WOULD BE A GREAT THING FOR THE WORLD. I DO BELIEVE THAT WILL HAPPEN. WE HAVE DISCUSSED IT. I ALSO DISCUSSED IT WITH CHINA. I DISCUSSED IT WITH PRESIDENT PUTIN AND WITH CHINA. I WILL TELL YOU, CHINA WAS VERY, VERY EXCITED ABOUT TALKING ABOUT IT. SO IS RUSSIA. SO I THINK WE’LL HAVE A DEAL AT SOME POINT. THE PARTICULAR PACT YOU’RE TALKING ABOUT THAT EXPIRED AS OF TODAY, THEY WEREN’T LIVING UP TO THEIR COMMITMENT. I SAID IF THEY’RE NOT GOING TO LIVE UP TO THEIR COMMITMENT, THEN WE HAVE TO — WE ALWAYS HAVE TO BE IN THE LEAD. YOU KNOW, I’VE REDONE OUR NUCLEAR. WE HAVE NEW NUCLEAR COMING. I HATE TO TELL THAT TO PEOPLE BECAUSE IT’S DEVASTATING, BUT WE ALWAYS HAVE TO BE IN THE LEAD. HOPE TO GOD YOU NEVER HAVE TO USE IT.>>[QUESTION INAUDIBLE]>>WE HAVE NEW EVERYTHING. WE HAVE THE FINEST MILITARY IN THE WORLD. WE MAKE THE FINEST EQUIPMENT IN THE WORLD BY FAR, WHETHER IT’S FIGHTERS, WHETHER IT’S MISSILES, WHETHER IT’S SHIPS. WHETHER IT’S SUBMARINES. THERE’S NOBODY TO COMPETE WITH US. IF WE COULD HOLD OFF SPENDING BY GETTING A PACT WITH RUSSIA AND WITH CHINA, THAT WOULD BE VERY GOOD FOR ALL THREE COUNTRIES.>>[QUESTION INAUDIBLE]>>YOU’RE TALKING ABOUT THE TRADE ON BEEF?>>[QUESTION INAUDIBLE]>>THE E.U. IS VERY TOUGH TO DEAL WITH. THEY’RE VERY DIFFICULT. THEY HAVE BARRIERS ON BEEF. WE BROKE THAT BARRIER TODAY. I APPRECIATE IT. IT’S A GROUP OF COUNTRIES AS YOU KNOW, WE LOVE THOSE COUNTRIES, BUT WITH DEALING THEM, THEY’RE VERY DIFFICULT. WE DID A VERY BIG DEAL TODAY, BEEF. WE’LL BE SELLING THEM A BIG PERCENTAGE OF THEIR BEEF. THAT’S GREAT FOR OUR RANCHERS AND FARMERS. WE WERE HAPPY TO DO IT.>>[QUESTION INAUDIBLE]>>AUTO TARIFFS ARE NEVER OFF THE TABLE. IF THEY WOULD NOT TREAT US FAIRLY, WHICH THEY’RE NOT. RIGHT NOW — LOOK, THE E.U. HAS TREMENDOUS BARRIERS TO US. BUT WE JUST BROKE THE FIRST BARRIER. MAYBE WE BROKE IT BECAUSE OF THE FACT THAT IF I DON’T GET WHAT WE WANT, I’LL PUT AUTO TARIFFS. IT’S ALL ABOUT THE AUTOMOBILE AND ALL ABOUT THE TARIFFS. IF I DON’T GET WHAT I WANT, I’LL HAVE NO CHOICE BUT MAYBE TO DO THAT. BUT SO FAR THEY’VE BEEN VERY GOOD. I WANT TO THANK MEXICO, THE NUMBERS ARE WAY, WAY DOWN APPREHENSIONS. THE NUMBERS ARE WAY DOWN. MEXICO, THEY HAVE ABOUT 21,000. THEY NOW HAVE MAYBE MORE THAN THAT ON OUR BORDER. THEY HAVE ANOTHER 6,000 ON THEIR NORTHERN BORDER. OKAY? THE NORTHERN BORDER. NEAR GUATEMALA. MEXICO IS DOING A GREAT JOB.>>[QUESTION INAUDIBLE]>>I WOULD LOVE TO SEE BEFORE WE TALK ABOUT SECRETARY, I WILL TELL YOU, I WOULD LOVE TO SEE THE DEMOCRATS SIT DOWN AND WORK OUT THE LOOP HOLES IN 20 MINUTES. THAT’S WHAT IT WOULD TAKE AND WORK OUT ASYLUM. WE’RE MOVING ALONG WITH AN ASYLUM FIX, AN ASYLUM BILL. LINDSEY GRAHAM IS HEADING IT UP. WE’LL SEE WHAT HAPPENS.>>[QUESTION INAUDIBLE]>>I’LL ALWAYS HELP OUR FARMERS. OUR FARMERS WERE TARGETED BY CHINA. OUR FARMERS, THEY’RE GREAT PATRIOTS. I’LL ALWAYS HELP OUR FARMERS. THERE WILL BE A BIG TIME WHEN THE BIGGEST BENEFICIARY OF WHAT WE’RE DOING WITH CHINA, YOU’RE SEEING IT WITH THE E.U. THEY COULDN’T DO THE CATTLE THINGS AT ALL. BEEF. THEY COULDN’T DO IT AT ALL. NOW ALL OF A SUDDEN THIS CAME OUT OF NOWHERE. OUR FARMERS WILL BE THE BIGGEST BENEFICIARIES. THEY KNOW THAT. THEY’RE GREAT PATRIOTS.>>[QUESTION INAUDIBLE] NO, WHAT HAPPENS IS CHINA DEVALUES THEIR CURRENCY AND CHINA IS POURING MONEY OUT. THAT WILL PAY FOR THE TARIFFS. IT’S A TOTAL MISNOMER. I DON’T SAY THAT WITH ALL COUNTRIES. BUT WITH CHINA, THEY’RE VERY HIGHLY SOPHISTICATED. SO ARE WE. MORE THAN ANYBODY WOULD UNDERSTAND. ALL YOU HAVE TO DO IS ASK CHINA. ASK CHINA. BUT LET ME JUST EXPLAIN. SO CHINA IS DEVALUING THEIR CURRENCY. THEY’RE ALSO POURING MONEY IN. THEIR CURRENCY IS GOING TO HELL. BUT THEY’RE POURING MONEY IN. THAT WILL TOTALLY PAY FOR THE TARIFFS. THEY’RE NOT BEING PAID FOR BY OUR PEOPLE. IT’S BEING PAID FOR BY CHINA. BECAUSE OF DEVALUATION AND BECAUSE THEY’RE PUMPING MONEY IN. THANK YOU. THANK YOU, EVERYBODY.>>[QUESTION INAUDIBLE]>>YOU INTERVIEWED THE WRONG FARMER. NUMBER 2, ANY AMOUNT THAT CHINA SUCKS UP, WE’RE MAKING UP OUT OF THE BILLIONS THAT WE TAKE IN. REMEMBER THIS, OUR COUNTRY IS TAKING IN BILLIONS AND BILLIONS OF DOLLARS FROM CHINA. WE NEVER TOOK IN TEN CENTS FROM CHINA. OUT OF THAT MANY BILLIONS OF DOLLARS, WE’RE TALKING A PART OF IT AND GIVING IT TO THE FARMERS BECAUSE THEY’VE BEEN TARGETED BY

100 thoughts to “Trump calls out media coverage of ex-DNI nominee Ratcliffe”

  1. The Press..they actually LOVE him..15 minutes off-the-cuff, in vast detail, regularly. You can feel it..and it's probably starting to be reciprocal, in fact. They were also quite polite too, in point of fact.

  2. All those questions & President Trump answered them without a script or TELEPROMPTER.

    Is it possible for even any one of them Damnitcrats in the running for President could even come close to addressing the (so-called) press like that ? ? ?

    O S! LMAO, ROTF LOL

    Not even

  3. I just wonder if some of the reporters wish their employers supported our president, he is the only one that just stops and talks to them openly and off-the-cuff.

  4. Douchebag evil fake news was already going in on Ratcliffe. He didn’t want to deal with the leftist mob. Democrats are all sickening anti American filth. Trump 2020.

  5. Good on ya for sticking to your guns, and putting America first!
    Big thank you for the nanny state of Australia.

  6. how does the press give him so much guff. He literally walks back and forth giving everyone a question. Making the helicopter wait lol

  7. I don't really know what went wrong with the Ratcliffe pick but IF he pulled out because he was going to get too much stick from MSM, he was not the man for the job. To be in the spotlight, you must have passion and an unshakeable belief in what you are doing. Trump has the passion, Justice Kavanaugh has the passion, Jim Jordan, Matt Gaetz and many others have it too. I suspect that with Ratcliffe, we may have had a lucky escape. Trump is gradually getting the right team around him but even he can make mistakes. Christopher Wray is a glaring example of one of Trump's mistakes. Hopefully the president will correct the mistake soon.

  8. I was a kid when Ike was Pres. Kennedy mythical like Camelot. But DJT I was swayed by the Lame Media. NZ…..but since I use utube now Trump best POTUS best example for the world

  9. Somebody do something about states mandating car insurance. They have been oppressing the poor and minority communities by forcing everyone to have liability over everyone else.. regardless of whether they can afford to pay the insurance for someone's expensive car or not.. you still have to run the risk of somebody hitting you uninsured and have to get full coverage if you want to protect your car… But you have the option to buy $2,000 car.. it's not worth insuring.. each person should be accountable for their own property and their own financial decisions. I shouldn't have to pay more insurance because somebody else chose to buy a $50,000 vehicle. It's keeping down the poor. And it's been going on for way too long. if y'all can't fix that then I can't trust you to fix anything.

  10. We shouldn't really have any ISIS prisoners …give them the same what they did to the 2000 Iraqi POWs !

  11. Somewhere somehow in the middle of his sentence speaking he just has to say fake new, which has no relation to what was talking about

  12. few people to ever work in our gov are as tough as trump, at least he understands some dont want to live a constant viscous fight as he can. its his #1 quality for success. his books spell that out plainly.

  13. I find it strange that the media goes to hell and high water to make Trump look like a monster….. while at the same time they can't seem to get enough of him!

  14. We need to deal with China before they take over the world. They bully their surrounding countries and if the USA give them the upper hand, our world is doomed.

  15. Consider Adm Mike Rogers. He's a hero. he came to u and told u u were being tapped. The truth will come out. All roads lead to Obamass

  16. Obama would have never spoke to press like this. He would have just tell his Michael LaVaughn Robinson Obama to go talk to them about dresses and recipes.

  17. people of America don't understand Your not the boss anymore over these countries. America have to come up with a whole different strategy now. etc. etc. etc.

  18. Trump has media coverage for free and a Twitter account. And his last rally in Cincinnati was wall to wall.

  19. To hell with the press! Of course someone giving someone else a job wants their loyalty. Ridiculous! Go with Tulsi..they can't cry about that 😉

  20. THE PERFECT CHOICE FOR OUR PRESIDENT …… PLACED BY GOD ALMIGHTY …….. SERVING GOD'S PURPOSES FOR ETERNITY.

  21. I support President Trump. All of you sorry little wussies who believe war is a thing of the past……… Hahaha??

  22. ANYONE who the press supports should NEVER be considered by Trump for ANY position. This should be the first criteria in his selection process. It really seems like a "no brainer".

  23. GOD BLESS PRESIDENT TRUMP FOR HIS RESILIENCE AND STRENGTH AND LOVE FOR OUR COUNTRY! We need to pray for him and his family and team that are hammered by liberals who NEVER open their minds!

  24. His complexion has changed a lot. He’s not orange spray tanned anymore. Actually he looks much healthier than before. Most presidents look 20 years older after their first term

  25. SO…EVERYTIME A POSITION IS BEING FILLED BY A REPUBLICAN & THE DEMOCRATS ACT OUT, YOU'RE GOING TO FOLD? THIS IS DANGEROUS!

  26. jeez, he's ridiculous.. he wastes so much time on the candidates who, even with a BASIC background check, would have come up as unfit.. but it's not like Trump or Moscow Mitch care, tehy're basically biding time while Moscow Mitch fills the courts with 21-year old "judges" to positions they'll be able to hold fo the next 70 years..

    They're attempting to set this country back like 150 years in anti-growith, anti-human policices. .

    I'm sure that The Russian Stalion is laughing at us as I type..

  27. He can make ratcliffe a federal judge. Why did the prior President's and prior trade representative's such idiots when dealing with China ?? Not a rhetorical question.

  28. Yes, people in USA pay tariff on China's product sold in USA, only if you buy them. President Trump policy will encourage US consumer to turn on America product not China's product, You do not pay tariff if you do not buy China's product. Democrat policy will weaken American economy.

  29. Trump 2020 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *