Kamala Harris On President Donald Trump Impeachment Investigation | The Last Word | MSNBC


. for you. .>>>I’VE SEEN HUNDREDS OF>>>I’VE SEEN HUNDREDS OF LETTERS FROM SENATORS TO OTHER LETTERS FROM SENATORS TO OTHER GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS, AND I HAVE GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS, AND I HAVE NEVER SEEN A LETTER LIKE THIS. NEVER SEEN A LETTER LIKE THIS. THIS LETTER IS FROM TWO SENATORS THIS LETTER IS FROM TWO SENATORS ADDRESSED TO EVERY MEMBER OF THE ADDRESSED TO EVERY MEMBER OF THE TRUMP CABINET. TRUMP CABINET. THOSE TWO SENATORS ARE FOREIGNME THOSE TWO SENATORS ARE FOREIGNME ATTORNEYS GENERAL IN THEIR ATTORNEYS GENERAL IN THEIR STATES. STATES. SENATOR CAMILLAKAMALA HARRIS AND SENATOR CAMILLAKAMALA HARRIS AND BLUMENTHAL AND THEY ARE BLUMENTHAL AND THEY ARE DEMANDING EVERY MEMBER OF THE DEMANDING EVERY MEMBER OF THE TRUMP CABINET QUOTE TAKE TRUMP CABINET QUOTE TAKE IMMEDIATE ACTION TO IDENTIFY AND IMMEDIATE ACTION TO IDENTIFY AND PRESERVE ALL RELEVANT EVIDENCE PRESERVE ALL RELEVANT EVIDENCE AND COOPERATE WITH ON GOING AND COOPERATE WITH ON GOING FUTURE INVESTIGATIONS. FUTURE INVESTIGATIONS. BOTH SENATORS ARE MEMBERS OF THE BOTH SENATORS ARE MEMBERS OF THE SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE AND SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE AND YESTERDAY THE CHAIRMAN INDICATED YESTERDAY THE CHAIRMAN INDICATED THERE IS AN INVESTIGATION HE THERE IS AN INVESTIGATION HE WOULD LIKE THE COMMITTEE TO WOULD LIKE THE COMMITTEE TO PURSUE. PURSUE. CHAIRMAN GRAHAM SAID HE WOULD CHAIRMAN GRAHAM SAID HE WOULD INVITE RUDY GIULIANI TO TESTIFY INVITE RUDY GIULIANI TO TESTIFY BEFORE THE SENATE JUDICIARY BEFORE THE SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE ABOUT QUOTE CORRUPTION COMMITTEE ABOUT QUOTE CORRUPTION IN UKRAINE. IN UKRAINE. SENATOR HARRIS RESPONDED TO THAT SENATOR HARRIS RESPONDED TO THAT ON TWITTER SAYING GOOD. ON TWITTER SAYING GOOD. I HAVE QUESTIONS. I HAVE QUESTIONS. JOINING US NOW IS SENATOR KAMALA JOINING US NOW IS SENATOR KAMALA HARRIS, DEMOCRAT FROM CALIFORNIA HARRIS, DEMOCRAT FROM CALIFORNIA A MEMBER OF THE JUDICIARY A MEMBER OF THE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE AND INTELLIGENCE COMMITTEE AND INTELLIGENCE COMMITTEE AND NOW A DEMOCRATIC COMMITTEE AND NOW A DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE FOR PRESIDENT OF THE CANDIDATE FOR PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES. UNITED STATES. SENATOR, THANK YOU VERY MUCH FOR SENATOR, THANK YOU VERY MUCH FOR JOINING US TONIGHT. JOINING US TONIGHT. I WANT TO BEGIN WITH WHAT READS I WANT TO BEGIN WITH WHAT READS LIKE A PROSECUTOR’S NOTICE LIKE A PROSECUTOR’S NOTICE LETTER SAYING PRESERVE ALL YOUR LETTER SAYING PRESERVE ALL YOUR DOCUMENTS, THIS COMES FROM YOU DOCUMENTS, THIS COMES FROM YOU AND SENATOR BLUMENTHAL TO FORMER AND SENATOR BLUMENTHAL TO FORMER STATE ATTORNEYS GENERAL, YOU STATE ATTORNEYS GENERAL, YOU ACTUALLY REFERENCED THAT IN YOUR ACTUALLY REFERENCED THAT IN YOUR LETTER. LETTER. I THINK THE PRECIPRECIPIENTS OF I THINK THE PRECIPRECIPIENTS OF LETTER TODAY KNOW THAT VERY WELL LETTER TODAY KNOW THAT VERY WELL ABOUT BOTH OF YOU. ABOUT BOTH OF YOU. WHAT ARE YOU HOPING TO WHAT ARE YOU HOPING TO ACCOMPLISH? ACCOMPLISH?>>TO PUT EVERYONE ON NOTICE,>>TO PUT EVERYONE ON NOTICE, LAWRENCE, THIS IS A PROCESS THAT LAWRENCE, THIS IS A PROCESS THAT IS ABOUT PURSUIT OF JUSTICE AND IS ABOUT PURSUIT OF JUSTICE AND TRUTH AND THAT WE ARE NOT GOING TRUTH AND THAT WE ARE NOT GOING TO TOLERATE IN OUR ROLE OF TO TOLERATE IN OUR ROLE OF OVERSIGHT ANY CONDUCT THAT OVERSIGHT ANY CONDUCT THAT INTERFERES WITH THAT PROCESS AND INTERFERES WITH THAT PROCESS AND SO WE ARE PUTTING MEMBERS OF THE SO WE ARE PUTTING MEMBERS OF THE CABINET ON NOTICE THAT THEY HAVE CABINET ON NOTICE THAT THEY HAVE A DUTY AND A RESPONSIBILITY TO A DUTY AND A RESPONSIBILITY TO PRESERVE EVIDENCE TO PROTECT PRESERVE EVIDENCE TO PROTECT WHISTLE BLOWERS AND THE WHISTLE BLOWERS AND THE INSPECTOR’S GENERAL OF THE INSPECTOR’S GENERAL OF THE VARIOUS AGAINENCYIES AND COOPERA VARIOUS AGAINENCYIES AND COOPERA WITH THE PROCESS AND FRANKLY, TO WITH THE PROCESS AND FRANKLY, TO YOUR POINT, THE LETTER PERHAPS YOUR POINT, THE LETTER PERHAPS IS UNIQUE BECAUSE I DON’T THINK IS UNIQUE BECAUSE I DON’T THINK IN RECENT HISTORY WE’VE SEEN THE IN RECENT HISTORY WE’VE SEEN THE NEED FOR THOSE KINDS OF OBVIOUS NEED FOR THOSE KINDS OF OBVIOUS POINTS TO BE MADE BUT WITH THIS POINTS TO BE MADE BUT WITH THIS ADMINISTRATION, WE CAN’T TAKE ADMINISTRATION, WE CAN’T TAKE ANYTHING FOR GRANTED, ESPECIALLY ANYTHING FOR GRANTED, ESPECIALLY WHEN WE’VE SEEN THE HIGHEST WHEN WE’VE SEEN THE HIGHEST ELECTED OFFICIAL IN OUR ELECTED OFFICIAL IN OUR GOVERNMENT DONALD TRUMP ACTIVELY GOVERNMENT DONALD TRUMP ACTIVELY ENGAGED IN THE SUPPRESS OF ENGAGED IN THE SUPPRESS OF EVIDENCE AND THE INTIMIDATION OF EVIDENCE AND THE INTIMIDATION OF WITNESSES. WITNESSES. SO I APPLAUD MY COLLEAGUE AND SO I APPLAUD MY COLLEAGUE AND FRIEND SENATOR BLUMENTHAL FOR FRIEND SENATOR BLUMENTHAL FOR ALL THE WORK HE HAS DONE FOR SO ALL THE WORK HE HAS DONE FOR SO MANY YEARS IN THE UNITED STATES MANY YEARS IN THE UNITED STATES SENATE AND HE AND I TOGETHER SENATE AND HE AND I TOGETHER HAVE MANY SHARED EXPERIENCES HAVE MANY SHARED EXPERIENCES THAT TELL US THAT AS FORMER THAT TELL US THAT AS FORMER PROSECUTORS, THIS KIND OF LETTER PROSECUTORS, THIS KIND OF LETTER AND INSTRUCTION IS NECESSARY AND INSTRUCTION IS NECESSARY WITH THIS ADMINISTRATION. WITH THIS ADMINISTRATION.>>I SAW ONE COMMENT ON TWITTER>>I SAW ONE COMMENT ON TWITTER TODAY ACTUALLY BY RICK, A TODAY ACTUALLY BY RICK, A FREQUENT QUEST ON THIS PROGRAM FREQUENT QUEST ON THIS PROGRAM SAYING THAT THE WHITE HOUSE SAYING THAT THE WHITE HOUSE COUNSEL’S LETTER YESTERDAY TO COUNSEL’S LETTER YESTERDAY TO THE HOUSE, TO THE COMMITTEE’S THE HOUSE, TO THE COMMITTEE’S ABOUT THE IMPEACHMENT PROCESS ABOUT THE IMPEACHMENT PROCESS BASICALLY SAID THAT THE BASICALLY SAID THAT THE CONSTITUTION IS CONSTITUTION IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL, WHICH I THINK UNCONSTITUTIONAL, WHICH I THINK IS THE SHORT-HAND FORIT. HAND FO IS THE SHORT-HAND FORIT. HAND FO I WANT TO GET A LEGAL, I WANT TO GET A LEGAL, PROFESSIONAL REACTION TO THAT PROFESSIONAL REACTION TO THAT LETTER. LETTER.>>YOU KNOW, LAWRENCE, I –>>YOU KNOW, LAWRENCE, I — THERE IS — EVERYTHING THAT IS, THERE IS — EVERYTHING THAT IS, YOU KNOW, SHOULD BE UP IS DOWN YOU KNOW, SHOULD BE UP IS DOWN AND DOWN IS UP WITH THIS AND DOWN IS UP WITH THIS ADMINISTRATION INCLUDING THAT ADMINISTRATION INCLUDING THAT STATEMENT. STATEMENT. IT IS RIDICULOUS ON ITS FACE AND IT IS RIDICULOUS ON ITS FACE AND THIS IS A MOMENT THAT HIGHLIGHTS THIS IS A MOMENT THAT HIGHLIGHTS THE MAGNIFICENT BRILLIANCE OF THE MAGNIFICENT BRILLIANCE OF THE FRAMERS OF OUR CONSTITUTION THE FRAMERS OF OUR CONSTITUTION AND THE FOUNDERS OF OUR NATION AND THE FOUNDERS OF OUR NATION WHO IMAGINED SUCH A MOMENT WHERE WHO IMAGINED SUCH A MOMENT WHERE THERE WOULD BE AN OUT RIGHT AND THERE WOULD BE AN OUT RIGHT AND OBVIOUS, AT THIS POINT, ABUSE OF OBVIOUS, AT THIS POINT, ABUSE OF POWER BY ONE BRANCH OF POWER BY ONE BRANCH OF GOVERNMENT IN THIS CASE THE GOVERNMENT IN THIS CASE THE EXECUTIVE BRANCH AND THE NEED EXECUTIVE BRANCH AND THE NEED THEREFORE FOR THESE KINDS OF THEREFORE FOR THESE KINDS OF CHECKS AND BALANCES. CHECKS AND BALANCES. SO THE LETTER TODAY FROM SENATOR SO THE LETTER TODAY FROM SENATOR BLUMENTHAL AND MYSELF AND SO BLUMENTHAL AND MYSELF AND SO MANY OTHERS WHO HAVE STOOD UP TO MANY OTHERS WHO HAVE STOOD UP TO STAND FOR ACCOUNTABILITY AND FOR STAND FOR ACCOUNTABILITY AND FOR OUR DEMOCRACY IS ABOUT LIVING OUR DEMOCRACY IS ABOUT LIVING WHAT OUR FOUNDERS IMAGINE MIGHT WHAT OUR FOUNDERS IMAGINE MIGHT BE NECESSARY, WHICH IS TO HAVE BE NECESSARY, WHICH IS TO HAVE THESE CHECKS AND BALANCES. THESE CHECKS AND BALANCES. BUT THAT STATEMENT IS RIDICULOUS BUT THAT STATEMENT IS RIDICULOUS AND IS CLEARLY JUST ANOTHER AND IS CLEARLY JUST ANOTHER EXAMPLE OF MEMBERS OF THIS EXAMPLE OF MEMBERS OF THIS ADMINISTRATION WHO FRANKLY ARE ADMINISTRATION WHO FRANKLY ARE VIOLATING THEIR OATH LAWRENCE. VIOLATING THEIR OATH LAWRENCE. I SAY THAT PURPOSELY. I SAY THAT PURPOSELY. IT’S NOT LIKE THEY ARE IGNORING IT’S NOT LIKE THEY ARE IGNORING IT OR OVERLOOKING IT. IT OR OVERLOOKING IT. THEY ARE VIOLATING IT. THEY ARE VIOLATING IT. THEY TOOK AN OATH TO DEFEND THE THEY TOOK AN OATH TO DEFEND THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES AGAINST ALL ENEMIES STATES AGAINST ALL ENEMIES FOREIGN AND DOMESTIC AND I THINK FOREIGN AND DOMESTIC AND I THINK IT IS CLEAR THAT THERE ARE IT IS CLEAR THAT THERE ARE ENEMIES WHO ARE AMERICAN ENEMIES WHO ARE AMERICAN CITIZENS, ENEMIES TO OUR CITIZENS, ENEMIES TO OUR DEMOCRACY AND THIS IS A MOMENT DEMOCRACY AND THIS IS A MOMENT WHERE EVERYONE SHOULD HAVE THE WHERE EVERYONE SHOULD HAVE THE COURAGE TO STAND UP AND SPEAK TO COURAGE TO STAND UP AND SPEAK TO THE VALUES OF OUR CONSTITUTION THE VALUES OF OUR CONSTITUTION AND OUR DEMOCRACY AND OUR SYSTEM AND OUR DEMOCRACY AND OUR SYSTEM OF JUSTICE. OF JUSTICE.>>SENATOR, I FOR ONE, BELIEVE>>SENATOR, I FOR ONE, BELIEVE THAT FRIENDS DO NOT ALLOW RUDY THAT FRIENDS DO NOT ALLOW RUDY GIULIANI TO TESTIFY UNDER OATH, GIULIANI TO TESTIFY UNDER OATH, SO YOU MAY NEVER GET YOUR DAY IN SO YOU MAY NEVER GET YOUR DAY IN THE SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE THE SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE TO ASK HIM QUESTIONS. TO ASK HIM QUESTIONS. I HAVE A FEELING THAT LINDSEY I HAVE A FEELING THAT LINDSEY GRAHAM INVITATION WON’T EVER BE GRAHAM INVITATION WON’T EVER BE DELIVERED BUT IF IT IS AND IF HE DELIVERED BUT IF IT IS AND IF HE DELIVERS TO CABLE NEWS THE GIFT DELIVERS TO CABLE NEWS THE GIFT OF RUDY GIULIANI TESTIFYING, OF RUDY GIULIANI TESTIFYING, WHAT QUESTIONS WOULD YOU HAVE WHAT QUESTIONS WOULD YOU HAVE FOR RUDY GIULIANI? FOR RUDY GIULIANI?>>I WOULD ASK AND THE PUBLIC>>I WOULD ASK AND THE PUBLIC HAS A RIGHT TO KNOW WHETHER AND HAS A RIGHT TO KNOW WHETHER AND WHAT THE PRESIDENT DIRECTED HIM WHAT THE PRESIDENT DIRECTED HIM TO DO AND WHAT EXACTLY UNDER TO DO AND WHAT EXACTLY UNDER WHAT CONDITIONS THOSE DIRECTIONS WHAT CONDITIONS THOSE DIRECTIONS TOOK PLACE. TOOK PLACE. THERE ARE QUESTIONS ABOUT WHO THERE ARE QUESTIONS ABOUT WHO GAVE RUDY GUNIULIANI THE AUTHORI GAVE RUDY GUNIULIANI THE AUTHORI TO WORK ON BEHALF OF THE UNITED TO WORK ON BEHALF OF THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT WHEN IN FACT STATES GOVERNMENT WHEN IN FACT HE WAS THE PRIVATE ATTORNEY OF HE WAS THE PRIVATE ATTORNEY OF THE PRESIDENT DOING HIS PERSONAL THE PRESIDENT DOING HIS PERSONAL BIDDING FOR THE PRESIDENT’S BIDDING FOR THE PRESIDENT’S POLITICAL BENEFIT. POLITICAL BENEFIT. I ALSO HAVE QUESTIONS, LAWRENCE, I ALSO HAVE QUESTIONS, LAWRENCE, ABOUT WHETHER THERE WAS ANY ABOUT WHETHER THERE WAS ANY BRIBERY AT PLACE HERE. BRIBERY AT PLACE HERE. BECAUSE IT — THAT IS A QUESTION BECAUSE IT — THAT IS A QUESTION IN MY MIND. IN MY MIND. WERE ANY OFFICIALS, FOREIGN OR WERE ANY OFFICIALS, FOREIGN OR DOMESTIC BRIBED IN ANY WAY TO DOMESTIC BRIBED IN ANY WAY TO CARRY OUT WHAT CLEARLY WAS AN CARRY OUT WHAT CLEARLY WAS AN ACT AGAINST THE BEST INTEREST OF ACT AGAINST THE BEST INTEREST OF OUR NATIONAL SECURITY? OUR NATIONAL SECURITY? SO I HAVE A LOT OF QUESTIONS AND SO I HAVE A LOT OF QUESTIONS AND I LOOK FORWARD TO RUDY GIULIANI I LOOK FORWARD TO RUDY GIULIANI TESTIFYING BEFORE THE SENATE TESTIFYING BEFORE THE SENATE UNDER OATH. UNDER OATH. I THINK IT WILL BE VERY I THINK IT WILL BE VERY REVEALING OF THE PRESIDENT, HIS REVEALING OF THE PRESIDENT, HIS ADMINISTRATION AND THE FOLKS ADMINISTRATION AND THE FOLKS THAT HE CHOOSES TO SERVICE HIS THAT HE CHOOSES TO SERVICE HIS ADVISORS. ADVISORS.>>SENATOR, PLEASE STAY WITH US>>SENATOR, PLEASE STAY WITH US ACROSS THE BREAK AND WHAT WE ACROSS THE BREAK AND WHAT WE COME BACK, I’LL ASK ABOUT THE COME BACK, I’LL ASK ABOUT THE SENATE INTELLIGENCE COMMITTEE SENATE INTELLIGENCE COMMITTEE BIPARTISAN REPORT. BIPARTISAN REPORT. I DON’T THINK PEOPLE REALIZE HOW I DON’T THINK PEOPLE REALIZE HOW BIPARTISAN SENATE COMMITTEE IS BIPARTISAN SENATE COMMITTEE IS THAT YOU RELEASED YESTERDAY THAT YOU RELEASED YESTERDAY SPECIFICS ABOUT THE RUSSIAN SPECIFICS ABOUT THE RUSSIAN INTERFERENCE AND THE ELECTION, INTERFERENCE AND THE ELECTION, NEW STEPPECIFICS INCLUDING THE W NEW STEPPECIFICS INCLUDING THE W THE RUSSIANS SPECIFICALLY THE RUSSIANS SPECIFICALLY TARGETED BLACK VOTERS AND THEIR TARGETED BLACK VOTERS AND THEIR DISINFORMATION. DISINFORMATION. WE’LL DO THAT ACROSS THIS

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *