Welcome to Space News from
the Electric Universe
brought to you by The
What is a neutron star?
Astronomers tell us that these
tiny yet massively dense objects
formed by the gravitational collapse from the
remnants of a massive star that exploded.
According to NASA, a neutron
star is about 20 km in diameter,
and has the mass of about
1.4 times that of our Sun.
This means that the neutron
star is so dense that on Earth,
one teaspoonful would
weigh a billion tons!
The theoretical neutron star
was invented to try to explain
highly intense bursts of energy
from tiny regions of space.
But no one has ever seen a neutron star,
scientists infer the object existence
when interpreting energetic
emissions in deep space.
Indeed according to a recent
paper in the journal Nature,
a so-called neutron star
has been discovered
that defies understanding
of accepted physics.
In the nearby galaxy M82, scientists have
observed ultra-luminous X-ray pulses
from what they believe is a
binary system between the star
and a pulsar or
rotating neutron star.
However, this so-called pulsar
shines impossible brightly
with the intensity
of 10 million suns.
In a recent Nature Podcast,
researcher Janet C. Gladstone
said of this discovery:
“The original theory that put this limit on how bright these
things should be is about 100 times fainter than this object.”
This was observed with NASA’s NuSTAR
it is a space X-ray telescope
that was actually put in
place exactly to survey
this kind of ultra-luminous
Now, what was observed was a pulsar
thought to be a rotating neutron star
that is emitting energies in the
ultra-luminous X-ray range.
Now, this is a real problem.
It has been held that super-massive
black holes are required
to power X-rays sources,
at this level of energies
and this pulsar is about 10 times
powerful than any know pulsar.
So, something was obviously
wrong with the current theory
and that is the point
that the author has made.
The real issue is that
has a gravity dominated
view of the universe.
powered by gravity,
so when an ultra-luminous X-rays source
is observed the first question is:
Where is the energy
coming from to power it?
Well, since gravity is the
only tool in the toolbox
the idea of an accretion
disk was evolved where
a super-massive black hole is
pulling matter from a companion star
This matter forms a very thin
accretion disk around the black hole
The angular momentum of
the in-falling matter
is converted to heat and
then super heated gas,
this is in the range of millions
Kelvin emits high-energy X-rays.
Let’s be clear, the astro-images
that we get are X-ray point sources
We don’t see accretion disks or
black holes or black holes binaries
What we see are highly
energetic points of X-rays,
points sources of X-rays,
X-rays that flicker and pulse.
But do you need exotic super dense masses
to get X-rays at this high energies?
Well, actually no.
Lightning is a very good example of
natural phenomenon that emits X-rays
and actually gamma rays as
well, at very high energies.
And let us look at the X-ray machines,
X-rays are emitted from X-ray tubes
basically a vacuum tube where a cathode
emits electrons which impact the anode.
The X-ray spectrum and energy dependent
on what is used as the anode
And the kind of accelerating voltage
you have for the vacuum tube.
I mean, we found this
all in the late 1800’s
So, you don’t really need an exotic super-massive
body and super heated gas to get X-rays.
And it’s a good thing too, because imagine
how big an X-ray machine would have to be
if gravity were the only power source that we
had with black holes and super heated gases.
Astrophysicists are finding all
kinds of stars that shouldn’t exist,
according to the
But even so, there is no hint that the
standard models of stars are under any threat.
Now we have a report of
a pulsating dead star
beaming with the energy of
about 10 million suns.
So, one might think it’s
back to the drawing board.
But how badly does a
theory have to fail
before you wipe the board
clean and start again?
How can a dead star beam far more
energy than 10 million live ones?
The reason for calling
a star “dead”
is that it has been found to
pulsate every 1.37 Seconds
which characterizes a supposed neutron star,
and it is assumed that only a very small
rapidly rotating object acting some-
how as a lighthouse could do that.
Also, say astrophysicists who adopt a
simple mechanical view of pulsars.
But this requires then to stuff more
than 1.5 times the mass of the sun
sphere of only 10 km radius.
As usual, when astrophysicists
run into difficulties
they call on particles
physicists to get them out of it.
And as usual, particle physicists
use it as an excuse for
inventing strange unseeing
states of matter or dark forces.
In the case of pulsars, we are told
that the atoms are squeezed so intensely
in the imagined death throats
of a large star that electrons
combine with protons in the nucleus
of each atom to form a neutron star.
This is another one of those
that can’t be tested
in the laboratory
Where neutrons only seem to exist
stably for more than a few minutes
inside an atomic nucleus in
the presence of protons.
However, two dinosaurs
unnoticed in Astrophysics Lab
are our total ignorance
of the cause of gravity
And their unshakeable belief that
stars are internally powered.
Newton wisely admitted that
he did not understand gravity
And Einstein merely described it
with a non-physical geometry.
But a moment of reflection
shows that the idea of
super condensed matter
in any form is nonsense.
Because it is asking the force of gravity
to overcome the electrical force
Which can be up 1,000 billion billion billion
billion times stronger than gravity.
Infrared images show
that stars are born
glowing current filaments.
This results in stars with
cool cores of heavy elements
that can not initiate a
And in the star’s gravitational field,
the heavy nucleus of each atom
will be drawn towards the center of
gravity of the star or planet.
That means each atom will
become football shaped,
With the inner end positive and
the outer end negatively charged.
These tiny atomic electric dipoles will
daisy chain like magnets and set up a
repulsive electric field inside the star
which offsets gravitational compression.
So, black holes and neutron
stars do not exist.
So, what is the electric universe answer
to the discovery of an object that
pulsates and shines about 100 times
brighter than theory suggest?
It has been shown that the complex structure
of stellar pulses can be explained
by repeated short circuits in the
magnetospheric circuit of a normal star.
There is no need for a fanciful
whirling neutron star .
It’s simple electrical
A relaxation oscillator effect
in the star atmosphere.
The ultra luminosity of a star or galactic
object can be attributed to 2 factors.
First, is a misinterpretation
which can place the star much
further away than it actually is.
If the star is much closer, the calculated
energy output may be grossly overestimated.
The second, is the ability for plasma
to store phenomenal amounts of
electromagnetic energy in a very
tiny volume known as a plasmoid.
Simple application then, of E=MC²
shows that a plasmoid can account
for the apparent concentration
of mass in a small volume.
No black holes or neutron
stars are necessary.
What’s more, plasmoids release particles
and energy periodically in jets
as shown by active
That suggests that we are looking down
the narrow beam of a stellar plasmoid
that is shining in our direction with
equivalent energy of 10 million suns.
As long as gravity is held
as the only energy source
for these cosmological phenomena
the mainstream astrophysicist
will continue to run into the kind of
issues that they found in the pulsar.
That leads me to kind of wonder where
mainstream theory would be now
if this kinds of X-ray gamma
rays and radio observations
have been available in the
late 1800’s or around 1900.
Available, for example, for people
like Faraday, or Maxwell,
or plasma science
pioneers as Birkeland.
Maybe now pulsars may be modeled
as oscillating circuits
and the energy that they pulse
and the frequency would dependent
on the acceleration voltage
of the electric field
and other characteristics
of the electrical circuit.
We know there are electric currents in
space carried by Birkeland filaments
These current-carrying filaments have
been directly observed between the Sun
and the Earth and for example
between Jupiter and Io.
We see filaments twisting and extending
thousands of light years wherever you look.
More importantly, we see
pulsing and flickering X-rays, gamma
rays and plasma glowing radio.
Things that are no more exotic than
lightning or electric circuits
that we’ve been building in lab
in the last 100 years or so.
For continuous updates on Space
News from the Electric Universe
stay tuned to